International Affairs and Technology Policy Making

Last Updated: Mon, 01/12/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
4050
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

A growing number of geopolitical struggles today are fought through infrastructure: chips and compute, undersea cables and satellites, standards and supply chains, and the cloud platforms that increasingly mediate economic and military power. This course examines how international technology policy is made in practice when interdependence is inescapable but security stakes are rising. We focus on the policy instruments that translate technical capability into political leverage: export controls and industrial policy, platform regulation and content governance, cybersecurity strategies and alliance coordination, and the management of high-consequence transitions (e.g., post-quantum cryptography). While the course focuses primarily on the fast-evolving relationships among the United States, Europe, and China, the dynamics we study routinely extend beyond this core and shape technology policy worldwide.

Students learn to read strategies and policy documents as instruments of power, to identify assumptions and implementation risks, and to produce decision-grade outputs under real-world constraints. Assessment emphasizes professional policy writing, one in-class crisis simulation, and a final portfolio (submitted as an alternative final assessment) rather than in-class exams.

The course is organized around three recurring propositions:

  • Infrastructure creates leverage. The most durable advantages often come from chokepoints, dependencies, and switching costs, not just ``innovation.''
  • Governance happens in the plumbing. Standards, procurement policies, compliance regimes, liability rules, and interoperability constraints can lock in power and shape conflict.
  • Dual-use is normal. ``Civilian'' systems routinely become security-relevant because they are widely deployed, privately operated, and difficult to replace quickly.

By the end of the course, students should be able to (i) explain how material and digital infrastructures (re)shape the international system, (ii) evaluate competing policy strategies across jurisdictions, and (iii) communicate clear recommendations to decision-makers under uncertainty and time pressure.

Course learning outcomes:

Upon successful completion of this course, you will be able to:
1. Diagnose an international technology policy problem by identifying the key actors, incentives,
institutions, and strategic dynamics.
2. Translate technical change into policy-relevant claims by distinguishing what is measurable,
what is uncertain, and what is hype.
3. Select and justify appropriate policy instruments, including standards, regulation, procurement,
industrial policy, export controls, alliances, and norms/treaties.
4. Write like a practitioner by producing concise, decision-grade memos that present options,
trade-offs, a recommendation, and an implementation pathway.
5. Stress-test strategies using cases and in-class simulations, with attention to cascades,
escalation risk, and unintended consequences.
6. Communicate across organizational cultures (e.g., engineering, diplomacy, regulation)
without sacrificing analytical precision.

Required course materials:

There is no required textbook. Readings will be drawn from academic articles, policy reports, government strategy documents, think tank analyses, and current affairs publications, and are accessible online and available on Canvas (see links in the Weekly Schedule section below). Optional/additional readings are exactly that: optional. Some weeks list more than others to offer a wider menu of sources, not to increase the expected workload, though you are always encouraged to read beyond the required minimum.

Grading policy:

Assessment is based on applied writing, one in-class crisis simulation, and a final portfolio submitted during the Registrar-scheduled final assessment window.

1) Participation & in-class labs/discussion (15%)
Ongoing. Includes preparation, discussion, and completion of in-class analytic artifacts. A great mark comes from consistent preparation and contributions that improve the class’s collective analysis. This includes demonstrating careful reading, asking informed questions,
and translating technical constraints into institutional and political realities.
2) Policy Analysis Brief (10%)
2–3 pages analyzing one policy/strategy document (problem definition, instruments, trade-offs, enforceability, and evidence). Due Fri 13 Feb 2026, 5:00pm. A great mark comes from disciplined, document-centered analysis. Your job is to make a policy/strategy document intelligible as a policy instrument: what it claims to solve, what it actually does, how it expects compliance, what it assumes about technology, and where its implementation risks are.
3) Policy Memo (20%)
4–6 pages, decision-grade memo (options, recommendation, implementation, risks). Due Fri 13 Mar 2026, 5:00pm. A great mark comes from writing like a practitioner: a clear problem statement, a small number of plausible options, explicit trade-offs, a justified recommendation, and an implementation pathway that takes politics and capacity seriously. Your memo should be concise, evidence based, and explicit about uncertainty.

4) Simulation: Undersea Infrastructure Crisis + After-Action Memo (20%)
In-class crisis simulation (Week 11) + 2-page memo (individual). After-Action Memo due Fri 10 Apr 2026, 5:00pm. A great mark comes from disciplined crisis reasoning: prioritizing under uncertainty, managing escalation risks, and communicating clearly under time pressure. The After-Action Memo should explain (i) what you did and why, (ii) what you learned about alliance politics and escalation management, and (iii) what you would do differently.

5) Final Portfolio (Alternative Final Assessment) (35%)
Portfolio package (analysis + risk register + feasibility/cost note + briefing slides). Due during the Registrar-scheduled final exam
slot for INTA 4050 (time TBA when posted; currently expected Mon 4 May 2026, 6–8.50pm)A great mark comes from integration, professionalism, and decision-readiness. It requires multiple complementary artifacts rather than a single essay. Your portfolio must include:
• Core analysis (4–6 pages): problem, stakes, options, recommendation, implementation.
• Risk register (1 page): top risks, likelihood/impact, mitigations, residual risk.
• Feasibility / cost note (1–2 pages): timeline, dependencies, who pays, what breaks.
• Briefing slides (5–7 slides): decision-ready summary that is targeted and inviting both in terms of content and presentation, crafted with your (imaginary) audience of senior decisionmakers in mind.

6) How your final course grade is calculated
Your course grade is computed as a weighted average of the five components listed above.
Each component is graded on a 0–100 scale, multiplied by its weight, and then summed to
produce a final percentage out of 100.
• Participation & in-class work: 15%
• Policy Analysis Brief: 10%
• Policy Memo: 20%
• Simulation + After-Action Memo: 20%
• Final Portfolio (Alternative Final Assessment): 35%
Your final grade will be assigned as a letter grade according to the following scale:
A 90–100%
B 80–89%
C 70–79%
D 60–69%
F 0–59%
Key due dates
PLEASE NOTE: These are hard deadlines.
• Fri 13 Feb 2026, 5:00pm: Policy Analysis Brief due
• Fri 13 Mar 2026, 5:00pm: Policy Memo due
• Mon 6 Apr 2026 (in class): Undersea Infrastructure Crisis Simulation
• Fri 10 Apr 2026, 5:00pm: Simulation After-Action Memo due
• Registrar-scheduled final exam slot (TBA): Final Portfolio due (currently expected Mon 4 May
2026, 6–8.50pm, but please double-check)

Late work, extensions, and unexpected events
Deadlines are part of the learning design in this course: they help you plan, help me grade fairly, and keep the class moving together. If something disrupts your ability to meet a deadline, please email me as soon as reasonably possible (ideally before the deadline) with a brief description of the situation and a proposed plan.
Extensions. I can often grant short extensions for good-faith reasons when requested in advance. In most cases, I will ask for documentation. You do not need to share sensitive details; when documentation is requested, a brief note from an appropriate authority (e.g., Student Health Services, a medical provider, the Dean of Students, or an accessibility/academic support office) confirming the situation is sufficient.
Late submissions. Unless an extension is approved, late work will receive a penalty of 5 percentage points per 24 hours (including weekends), up to 72 hours. After 72 hours, the assignment will receive a zero, except in cases of documented emergencies or official accommodations.
Final portfolio. The Final Portfolio is the course’s alternative final assessment and must be submitted during the Registrar-scheduled final assessment window (see syllabus). Late finalportfolio submissions can only be accepted in line with Institute policy and official accommodations.

Attendance policy:

Regular attendance is expected and contributes significantly to your grade. Given the evening timing and small class size, your presence and engagement are essential to the learning environment. If you must miss a class, please notify the instructor in advance. More than two unexcused absences will affect your participation grade.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Georgia Tech aims to cultivate a community based on trust, academic integrity, and honor. Students are expected to act according to the highest ethical standards. Review Georgia Tech’s Honor Code and the student Code of Conduct. Any student suspected of cheating or plagiarizing on a quiz, exam, or assignment will be reported to the Office of Student Integrity, who will investigate the incident and identify the appropriate penalty for violations.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Social Sciences area.
Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals.
This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question:
• How do I understand human experiences and connections?
Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcomes:
• Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social or geographic relationships develop, persist or change.
Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies:
• Intercultural Competence
• Perspective-Taking
• Persuasion

Instructor First Name:
Juljan
Instructor Last Name:
Krause
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
35119
Department (you may add up to three):

Middle East Relations

Last Updated: Wed, 01/07/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
3260
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This course is an in-depth introduction to the study of the politics of the Middle East. The course is divided into several thematic interrelated parts. First, an overview of International Relations theory will guide the analysis and approaches used to understand and analyze various dynamics in the Middle East. After understanding the theoretical underpinnings, the class will be divided into several general themes that are important to understand the Middle East’s current affairs, priorities, and issues inclusive of (1) the emergence of the state system, (2) the role of non-state actors, (3) the evolution of governance and revolutions, (4) Arab-Israeli relations, (5) the Israeli Palestinian conflict, amongst other issues. Further, discussions in International Relations theory will help us understand the region and its place in the global political system. Based on the historical and theoretical background provided, students will emerge with tools and approaches to analyze social and political issues in the Middle East, grasp the nature of the interplay between international, regional, and local dynamics to explain Middle East politics, and understand the implications of the pressing issues in the Middle East for the global political system.

Course learning outcomes:

Upon successful completion of this course, students should be able to:

  • demonstrate the ability to analyze social and political issues in the Middle East (Research on the Middle East)
  • grasp the nature of the interplay between international, regional, and local dynamics to explain Middle East politics (International Relations theory and the Middle East), and
  • understand the implications of the pressing issues in the Middle East for the global political system (Globalizations and trade of the Middle East).
Required course materials:
  • A History of the Modern Middle East 7th Edition by William L. Cleveland
  • International Relations of the Middle East 4th Edition by Louise Fawcett (978-0198708742).
  • Additional materials (such as journal articles and current analysis) will be assigned during the semester, so please check the syllabus posted on Canvas weekly for the latest readings
Grading policy:

Attendance and Class participation (20%)

Attendance is required and students must complete the assigned readings before class in order to participate in class activities. Absences will count against students’ participation score. The class participation mark will be based on attendance AND the quality of your in-class oral comments as well as on the quality of your performance on written exercises that will be handed to you in class.

Religious Holy Days: Students who anticipate being absent from classes or miss the assignment deadlines due to religious observance should inform me by the end of the second week. Please note that assignment dates are fixed and no make-ups will be offered without an official/medical letter explaining your situation. For all other missed deadlines, I reserve the right to penalize your grades by 10% a day. 

In class presentations, worksheets, and quizzes (25%)

Worksheets: Throughout the course, students will participate in different in- class activities, including discussions, small group projects and case analyses. In some of those activities, students will be required to complete written worksheets. There are three possible grades for the worksheets: check plus, check minus and 0. The lowest worksheet score will be dropped.

Quizzes: Students might be asked to complete several quizzes throughout the course. These short quizzes will have two short answer questions related to the readings for the class.

Presentation: Students will be asked to sign up for at least one class, for which they will present an analysis of the readings at the beginning of the class. They will present for 10 minutes and guide a 20 minute discussion following their presentation. 

Midterm Exam 1 (25%)

This midterm exam will take place on February 26, 2025. More details will be provided before the exam.

Final Research Project and Presentation: (20%+10%): Research project aims to train students for a successful career in academia, journalism, and policy circles. You must get a confirmation from me for your country case, research question, literature research and presentation date no later than the third week of the course. I will give more details on the research project in the class.

The project involves students working on a topic involving an approved topic of their choosing. Each student is required to do:

  1. A details one-page plan of their research topic (5 points)
  2. 5-page paper single space on their topic (15 points)
    • Final paper due by email 11:59pm on April 20.
  3. Present their topic in class (7-10 minute presentation; 5 minus Q&A) (10 points)
    • Presentations will take place the last day of classs.
    • Powerpoint recommended 

 Grading Scale: 100-90 A⏐89-80 B⏐79-70 C⏐69-60 D⏐59-0 F

Grade Change Policy

Legitimate requests for grade changes are welcome. However, you should resist the temptation to file a frivolous request just hoping to “get lucky”. Simple computational or clerical errors should be brought to the professor’s attention immediately. Otherwise requests for grade changes must: i) be submitted in writing either electronically or in hard copy, ii) be submitted within 7 days of receiving the graded assignment, and iii) be no longer than 600 words and no shorter than 150 words. Requests for grade changes should identify what was required in the assignment, describe precisely how these requirements were fulfilled at a level above the received grade and address any relevant comments written by the professor on the graded assignment (if applicable) and explain why they do not apply. Note that grade changes requests can result in re-grades both up or down (or left unchanged). That is, if the greater scrutiny demanded by a grade change request reveals your assignment to deserve a lower grade than previously awarded, then the lower grade may be assigned.

 

 

Attendance policy:

Policy on Attendance and Absences

Attendance is required, although each student can have 1 (one) unexcused absence without

penalty. Absences for medical or personal emergencies will be excused upon verification by the Office of the Dean of Student Life. Absences due to participation in Institute activities including school athletics will be excused upon verification by the registrar. Absences due to military service will be handled on a case-by-case basis and subject to verification.

In the event of an unexcused absence, you will NOT be granted any special accommodations including but not limited an opportunity to make up work for in-class exercises. Thus, if you miss class due to an unexcused absence, you are likely to suffer a grade penalty due to your inability to participate in an in-class exercise or in class discussion. You will also be responsible for any material, assignments, or announcements covered in class that you miss as a result of an unexcused absence.

Course participants will treat each other with respect. Constructive questioning and criticism are welcome, even encouraged. Personal attacks and insults are not. The rule of thumb here is that critical comments and questions should be maturely phrased in a manner that

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Social Sciences area. 

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help students master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals.   

This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question: 

  • How do I understand human experiences and connections? 

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome:

  • Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social, or geographic relationships develop, persist, or change.  

Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies: 

  • Intercultural Competence
  • Perspective-Taking
  • Persuasion 
Instructor First Name:
Rana
Instructor Last Name:
Shabb
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
30416
Department (you may add up to three):

Introduction to Global Development

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
2050
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

Introduction to Global Development provides students with a foundational understanding of the political, economic, and social forces that shape development outcomes across the world. The course introduces classic theories of development, contemporary critiques, and the real-world constraints practitioners face.

Drawing on global cases, data, practitioner insights, and current debates, students will learn to analyze why some countries prosper while others struggle, what actors influence development, and how today’s geopolitical landscape, climate pressures, and fragility shape the future of global development.

The course culminates in an applied Budget Allocation Simulation for Haiti, where students assume the role of development decision-makers managing a $150 million portfolio.

There are no prerequisites for this course.

Course learning outcomes:

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

  1. Define “development” and situate it within key theories and debates.
  2. Compare competing explanations for poverty, inequality, and underdevelopment.
  3. Analyze how institutions, conflict, gender, governance, markets, and external actors shape development outcomes.
  4. Evaluate the role of donors, NGOs, multilateral organizations, and private actors.
  5. Use evidence and data to assess the state of global development today.
  6. Apply analytic skills in an applied simulation, written essays, and presentations.
  7. Communicate development concepts clearly in writing and orally.
Required course materials:
  • Doha Declaration article (Al Jazeera / UN News)
  • Center for Global Development Annual Meeting video: “Development Cooperation Amid Upheaval”
  • Tooze, “The End of Development”
  • Banerjee & Duflo, “The Economic Lives of the Poor”
  • Collier, The Bottom Billion (selected chapters)
  • Sen, “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing”
  • Stasavage, “Democracy and Education Spending in Africa”
  • Center for Global Development Commitment to Development Index (CDI)
  • Center for Global Development Annual Meeting video: “Evaluating AI: What’s New and Why the Development Sector Should Care”
  • Banerjee & Duflo, “The Economic Lives of the Poor”
  • Collier, The Bottom Billion (selected chapters)
  • Sen, “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing”
  • Incoom, Examining the Impact of International Aid Dependency on Governance and Corruption in African Nations: A Critical Analysis of United Nations Donations
  • Center for Global Development Commitment to Development Index (CDI)
  • Center for Global Development Annual Meeting video: “Evaluating AI: What’s New and Why the Development Sector Should Care”
Grading policy:

Case Worksheets (6) 30%

Current Issues Presentation 15%

Participation (in-class) 20%

Final Individual Essay (4–5 pages) 20%

Final Group Presentation 15%

Participation is based entirely on in-person engagement, including discussion, small-group work, simulations, and presentations.

Attendance policy:

Attendance is required for all classes.  Students are allowed 1 (one) unexcused absence without penalty. In the event of an unexcused absence, you will not be given any opportunity to make up work for in-class exercises. You will also still be responsible for any material, assignments, or announcements covered in class that you miss as a result of an unexcused absence. Course participants will treat each other with respect. Constructive questioning and criticism are welcome, even encouraged to ensure a robust discussion on the topics at hand.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Instructor First Name:
Alexious
Instructor Last Name:
Butler
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
24320
Department (you may add up to three):

Chinese Politics

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
4331/8803
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

After experiencing decades of rapid economic growth, China has emerged as one of the most powerful countries in the world, and it is already having a profound impact on the global economy and international security. This class seeks to make sense of China’s complex political system. The course starts by focusing on modern Chinese history from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the economic reforms of the Reform and Opening Era. It then examines important features of modern Chinese governance such as center-local relations, fragmented authoritarianism, state-society relations, factionalism, the relationship between the CCP and state institutions, surveillance, censorship, the hukou system, and nationalism. The course then focuses on modern challenges in the governance of China including corruption, environmental degradation, slowing economic growth, and a looming demographic crisis. The course finishes by examining China under the leadership of Xi Jinping and how domestic politics influences its behavior on the world stage.

Course learning outcomes:

By the end of this course, students should be able to: 

  • Examine the historical and cultural influences upon modern Chinese politics.
  • Assess important concepts about Chinese politics and apply these to examining China’s governance today.
  • Draw upon concepts and lessons learned about Chinese politics to understand the domestic sources of China’s behind China’s behavior on the world stage. 
Required course materials:

Most readings will be available through Canvas or can be found through the library. There is one required book for the course:

Jonathan D. Spence, The Search for Modern China, W.W. Norton and Company, 1990.

Grading policy:

Your final grade will be assigned as a letter grade according to the following scale: 

A  90-100% 

B  80-89% 

C  70-79% 

D  60-69% 

F 0-59% 

Attendance policy:

Your success in this course depends on careful preparation for and active engagement in seminar discussions. You are expected to read and study all assigned materials, come to class prepared to contribute to the seminar, and engage in thoughtful and critical discussions with your classmates and instructor. Attendance is a prerequisite for participation. 

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Social Sciences area.

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help students master course content, and support students’ broader academic and career goals.

This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question:

  • How do I understand human experiences and connections?

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome:

  • Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social, or geographic relationships develop, persist, or change.

Course content, activities, and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies: 

  • Intercultural Competence
  • Perspective-Taking
  • Persuasion
Instructor First Name:
Robert
Instructor Last Name:
Hines
Section:
A/LH
CRN (you may add up to five):
35121
35315
Department (you may add up to three):

International Security

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
6103
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This graduate-level course (for MA and PhD students) surveys prominent scholarship on the theory and practice of international security. Although this course covers several topics central to the study of international security, it is by no means exhaustive. Thus, graduate students preparing for comprehensive exams are encouraged to read more widely, including recommended readings in this syllabus and other syllabi on security studies. Some of the topics that will be covered in this course include debates about the security studies field, deterrence, coercion, bargaining, audience costs, war termination, causes of war, leaders, psychology, status, reputation, emotions, memory, power transitions, grand strategy, alliances, offense-defense balance, military doctrine, strategic culture, nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, civil war, terrorism, humanitarian intervention, and emerging technologies. This course will draw on a combination of classical works in the field of security studies as well as more contemporary policy-focused works. Throughout the course, students will ask what security means, what constitutes threats, how the nature of conflict has changed (or not) in world politics today. Students will develop a foundation of knowledge about important debates in the field of international security and draw upon concepts from the course to understand contemporary events in international security. In addition to the content on international security, students will also develop their policy writing, research, and analysis skills. Due to time constraints, the course cannot cover every topic in international security, and it will only provide cursory overviews of some topics that are regularly offered and covered much more thoroughly in other INTA courses (i.e., terrorism, WMDs, nuclear weapons). Students are strongly encouraged to take courses offered by other INTA faculty for a deeper study of these topics. Similarly, while these course draws uponconcepts from international relations theory, it does not duplicate material covered in INTA 6102, International Relations Theory.

Course learning outcomes:

By the end of this course:

• Students will be able to apply research skills to address problems in the field of international affairs.

• Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of principal contemporary global challenges in the field of international security

• Students will demonstrate knowledge of the influences that drive security policy formulation and execution.

Required course materials:

Most readings for this course are available online through the Georgia Tech Library or are open access. I have uploaded any readings that are not available through the library or online to Canvas.

Grading policy:

Your final grade will be assigned as a letter grade according to the following scale:

A 90-100%

B 80-89%

C 70-79%

D 60-69%

F 0-59%

Attendance policy:

Your success in this course depends on careful preparation for and active engagement in seminar discussions. You are expected to read and study all assigned materials, come to class prepared to contribute to the seminar, and engage in thoughtful and critical discussions with your classmates and instructor. Attendance is mandatory and a prerequisite for participation. Moreover, it is important to emphasize that good participation is measured not by the quantity of times you speak, but by the quality of your contribution, with your comments demonstrating not only comprehension of the course materials but also critical thinking skills. 

 

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Instructor First Name:
Robert
Instructor Last Name:
Hines
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
26511
Department (you may add up to three):

American Government

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
1200
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This course is designed to give students an introduction to American political foundation & political institutions, actors, and processes but with an added comparative perspective with other countries. The students will not only be expected to understand these topics but also be able to critically evaluate them.

Course learning outcomes:
  • Understand the background and historical context that shapes the American political system.
  • Gain a broad understanding of the institutions, actors, participants, and processes of politics and government in America.
  • Understand how government, politics, and policy impact your daily life.
  • Understand the basic structure and operations of GA state government
  • Understand how the American governmental system is similar to and different from other structures around the world.
  • Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of principal contemporary global challenges in the field of international affairs
Required course materials:

There is no required textbook for this course. However, there are mandatory readings that will be posted to Canvas. All readings are subject to change but students will be notified in advance. Unless otherwise noted, all readings, audio files, or videos are mandatory.

Grading policy:

A = 100-90; B = 89-80; C = 79-70; D = 69-60; F = 59 and below. Mid-term grades or progress reports will be listed as S = Satisfactory, meaning 70 and above, or U = Unsatisfactory, indicating a grade below 70. If you are taking the class Pass/Fail, then the same mid-term grade standard will also be applied for a final grade of “S” = Satisfactory as well.

Attendance policy:

This is an online course and attendance is not recorded. However, completion of the syllabus quiz is the same as verification of participation. Completion of all lectures/reading/assignments prior to the exams is essential to success in this course. 

*Excused Absence policy – This course will follow the University’s policy for excused absences. Absences for medical or personal emergencies will be excused upon verification by the Office of Student Life. You can find an outline of the policy here http://www.catalog.gatech.edu/policies/student-absence-regulations/ (Links to an external site.) This would apply to illness as well as personal emergencies. Please review this page if you are not familiar with it. In addition, all institute approved absences will honored, which would include university sanctioned function, athletics, etc. when accompanied by the appropriate documentation. Absences resulting from oversleeping, alarms not going off, computer crashes, drink or food specials, lost wallets, lost purses, or dogs eating papers, books, flash drives, etc. will not be considered approved absences.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

By attending Georgia Tech you have all committed to upholding the ideals of honor and integrity as well as refusing to betray this trust that has been bestowed upon you as a member of our academic community (http://w (Links to an external site.)ww.policylibrary.gatech.edu/student-affairs/academic-honor-code (Links to an external site.) or http://www.catalog.gatech.edu/rules/18/).  (Links to an external site.)Any student who is suspected of violations of this honor code including but not limited to cheating or plagiarizing on a quiz, exam, or assignment will be automatically reported to the Office of Student Integrity. This office will investigate the incident as well as recommend the penalties for the violations.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

 

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Social Sciences area. 

 

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help students master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals.  

This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question: 

·       How do I understand human experiences and connections?  

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome: 

·       Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social, or geographic relationships develop, persist, or change.  

Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies: 

·       Intercultural Competence  

·       Perspective-Taking  

·       Persuasion  

 

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Citizenship area.

 

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals. 

 

This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question:

  • How do I prepare for my responsibilities as an engaged citizen?

 

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome:

  • Students will demonstrate knowledge of the provisions and principles of the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Georgia.

 

Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies:

  • Critical Thinking
  • Intercultural Competence
  • Persuasion  
Instructor First Name:
Christopher
Instructor Last Name:
McDermott
Section:
O
CRN (you may add up to five):
31678
Department (you may add up to three):

Technology and Statecraft

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
8803
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This class will explore comparative approaches to statecraft. It will examine the sources and conduct of statecraft in modern world politics. The course will be divided into three parts. The first part of the course will cover theories, concepts, the sources and implementation of statecraft, and the components of order in the international system. The second part of the course will examine different dimensions of power and statecraft, including concepts related to modern military power and alliances, hybrid and information warfare, sanctions and economic statecraft, as well as how new emerging technologies shape the conduct of statecraft in world politics. The third and final component of the course will focus on applying these concepts to assessing Russian, Chinese, and American statecraft. 

Throughout the course, students will critically evaluate different dimensions of statecraft and apply them to real-world cases. Assignments throughout the course will provide students opportunities to apply research and critical thinking skills, as well as practice communicating to different types of audiences in a clear and succinct manner.

Course learning outcomes:

By the end of the course, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate knowledge of theories of international relations and apply them in analyzing events and outcomes in world affairs.
  2. Demonstrate knowledge of principal contemporary global challenges in the field of international security.
  3. Apply research skills to address problems in the field of international affairs. 
  4. Demonstrate knowledge of the influences that drive security policy formulation and execution. 
Required course materials:

Course Text

All required readings are in Canvas under the “Reading List” tab.

Grading policy:

Assignment

Weight (Percentage, points, etc.)

(2) Analytical Paper

25%

(3) Guided Response Papers

25%

(1) Policy Brief 

25%

(1) Op-Ed 

25%

 

Grading Scale

Your final grade will be assigned as a letter grade according to the following scale:

A          90-100%

B          80-89%

C         70-79%

D         60-69%

F          0-59%

Submitting Assignments

All assignments (homework, knowledge checks, exams etc.) must be completed and submitted within the Canvas. Sending assignments (homework, knowledge checks, exams etc.), whether early, on time, or late to the professors is not permitted and will not be accepted.  If there are technical issues, please notify the help desk, as well as the professor immediately.

Assignment Due Dates

All assignments will be due at the times listed above. These times are subject to change so please check back often. Please convert from Eastern Time to your local time zone using a Time Zone Converter.

Late and Make-up Work Policy

Late work will be marked down by one letter grade and an additional letter grade every 24 hours after it is late.

Attendance policy:

Lecture videos are provided virtually.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Instructor First Name:
Robert
Instructor Last Name:
Hines
Section:
QIS
CRN (you may add up to five):
33284
Department (you may add up to three):

Intro to International Affairs

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
1110
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This course is intended to introduce students to the study of International Affairs. This is a political science course focused on the history and development of theories relating to the international system and how this translates to foreign policy. It will cover the main IR theories in the first half of the course, then moving on to real-world applications to understand current events and global governance.

Course learning outcomes:
  • Understand the background and historical development of the current international system.
  • Gain a broad understanding of various theoretical paradigms and how they inform policy.
  • Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of theories of international relations and apply them in analyzing events and outcomes in world affairs. 
  • Understand the basic structure and operations of global governance as well as its key actors and institutions. 
  • Become competent in the basic language of our field as well as methodologies used to advance its research. 
Required course materials:

There is no required textbook for this course. All readings and lectures are posted to Canvas. All readings are subject to change; however, students will be notified in advance. Unless otherwise noted, all readings, audio files, or videos are mandatory. 

Grading policy:

A = 100-90; B = 89-80; C = 79-70; D = 69-60; F = 59 and below. Mid-term grades or progress reports will be listed as S = Satisfactory, meaning 70 and above, or U = Unsatisfactory, indicating a grade below 70. If you are taking the class Pass/Fail, then the same mid-term grade standard will also be applied for a final grade of “S” = Satisfactory as well. 

Attendance policy:

There is no schedule for this course. You are expected to complete the readings/lectures/videos in the modules section prior to each exam. 

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help students master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals.   

  This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question:  

  • How do I understand human experiences and connections?   

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome:  

  •   Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social, or geographic relationships develop, persist, or change.   

Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies:  

  • Intercultural Competence  
  • Perspective-Taking  
  • Persuasion   
Instructor First Name:
Eric
Instructor Last Name:
Koob
Section:
O
CRN (you may add up to five):
35064
Department (you may add up to three):

Global Politics of Technology

Last Updated: Mon, 01/05/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
3044
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This course will investigate the economic and political dynamics of technological innovation and the role of strategies, policies, regulations, and other institutions in its global diffusion. We also explore why some countries are better at innovation than others.

The course is divided into four modules:

PART I              Defining and Understanding Science, Technology, and Innovation                                                    

PART 2             Governing Technological Innovation & STI Policy

PART 3             Creating Regulatory and Technology Standards

PART 4:            Special Issues

We ask:  What do we mean by science and technology? Why do countries adopt similar or different science, technology, and innovation strategies, regulations, and standards in support of economic growth? What are the different paths that technological innovation and diffusion take, and how do they impact productivity and competitiveness? Who governs these processes and how? Ultimately, these questions help us understand the role of government, markets, and society in shaping global technological and economic change. While the subject is vast, the course's scope helps keep it manageable. It draws on the scholarly and popular literature, as well as industry examples. The course also compares US technology innovation strategies with those of Europe, Asia, and selected developing countries.

The course is open to advanced undergraduates and graduate students. Prior work in political science or economics is strongly recommended

I have tried to keep your weekly readings manageable. The course delves more deeply into economic, political, and technological elements. However, you are given the flexibility to choose research topics of particular interest to you.  

Please keep apprised of current issues regarding the economic and political dynamics of technological innovation by reading a good daily or weekly publication such as The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The New York Times, and/or The Economist. I will also be posting current event articles on Canvas from time to time.  These will help link some of the more conceptual themes in the course with real-world events. 

 

 

Course learning outcomes:

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

  • Identify, compare, and evaluate different sets of policies and institutions (finance, research & development, skills, other) governing different types of technologies across countries;
  • Apply theoretical frameworks towards understanding science, technology, and innovation and their impact on economic change;
  • Trace and compare a technology over time between two countries alongside regulations/institutions designed to govern it;
  • Establish good research questions;
  • Strengthen your capability to develop persuasive arguments;
  • Strengthen your critical analysis and presentation skills;
  • Research, analyze, and write a paper on any of the course module topics, thereby deepening their understanding of the phenomenon under question.
Required course materials:

COURSE READINGS

Readings designated with a “u” symbol are downloadable from Canvas

Course readings are subject to change.

The professor will provide sufficient advanced notice of any changes/substitutions.

PART I                        Defining and Understanding Science, Technology, and

                                  Innovation                                                   

WEEK 1

Course Introduction

Jan. 12                         Course Introduction

Student Introductions

Syllabus Review 

Review of Key Concepts/Definitions

Jan. 14                         Review of Key Concepts/Definitions Cont…

How do we measure and compare countries' science, technology, and innovation status?

                                    OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators (comparing countries)

https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/main-science-and-technology-indicators.html 

Data to compare STI status among countries – STI Scorecard

https://www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard.htm#explore   

WEEK 2

Historical Context: Technology, Invention, & Innovation Cases

Jan. 19                         No Class – MLK Day

 

Jan. 21                         uFallows, James (2013), The 50 Greatest Breakthroughs Since the Wheel, The Atlantic, (Nov. 2013). 

 

BBC Science Focus experts (2025). The 25 most powerful ideas of the 21st century (so far), picked by the world’s top thinkers. Nov. 2025. https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/experts-pick-the-25-most-significant-breakthroughs-of-the-21st-century

uDavid, Paul, 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American 

Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 332-37, May. 

 

                                    uF.M. Scherer (1965), Invention and Innovation in the Watt-Boulton Steam-Engine Venture, Technology and Culture, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Spring, 1965), pp. 165-187.

 

PART 2                       Governing Technological Innovation & STI Policy

 

WEEK 3

The Changing Role of the State

 

Jan. 26                         uMazzucato, Marianna, 2013. The Entrepreneurial State. Introduction & Summary + Chapters 2, 3, 4.

 

uBlock, Fred, 2008. Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics & Society, 36(2), pp.169-206

 

 

Jan. 28                         What are the STI key issues, trends, and governance recommendations?

OECD (2025), OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2025 - Driving Change in a Shifting Landscape, OECD Publishing, Paris https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2025_5fe57b90-en.html 

(Executive Summary + Chapters 1, 6, 7)

 

uJohan Schot, W. Edward Steinmueller, Transformative change: What role for science, technology and innovation policy?: An introduction to the 50th Anniversary of the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) Special Issue, Research Policy, Volume 48, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 843-848.

 

uMeissner, D. (2014). Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 34-56.

 

WEEK 4

Country Cases

 

Feb. 2                          No Class – Read Cases (listed on Feb. 4 class, below) On Own

 

Feb. 4                          Cases: China, US, and the EU 

China:

World Economic Forum. How China’s 15th five-year plan signals a new phase of strategic adaptation. Oct 30, 2025. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/how-china-s-15th-five-year-plan-signals-a-new-phase-of-strategic-adaptation/#:~:text=China%20sketched%20out%20the%20country's,juncture%20for%20China's%20modernization%20journey 

 

United States:

uUS Department of Energy. Energy Department Launches ‘Genesis Mission’ to Transform American Science and Innovation Through the AI Computing Revolution. November 29, 2025. https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-department-launches-genesis-mission-transform-american-science-and-innovation 

uHarrington, J. (July 1, 2021). What the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act Gets Right (and What It Gets Wrong). CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-us-innovation-and-competition-act-gets-right-and-what-it-gets-wrong 

 

European Union: 

uEuropean Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Horizon Europe strategic plan 2025-2027, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/092911

 

WEEK 5

Innovation Ecosystems: Institutions, Networks, Organizations, and Collaboration

 

Feb. 9                          uBinz, C., and B. Truffer. 2017. “Global Innovation Systems—A

Conceptual Framework for Innovation Dynamics in Transnational

Contexts.” Research Policy 46, no. 7: 1284–1298.

uLundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.

 

Feb. 11                        uXin, P., Arshad, N. I., Mohamad, U. H., Huang, Y., & Su, S. J. (2025). Reframing the Triple Helix for Sustainability: A Mechanism‐Based Framework for University–Industry–Government Collaboration in Global Innovation Systems. European Journal of Education, 60(4), e70361.

 

Recommended:

 

uCooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and corporate change, 10(4), 945-974.

uMalerba, F. (2002), Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264.

 

WEEK 6

Diffusing Technologies and Institutions

 

Feb. 16                        uJeffrey Ding. Technology and the Rise of Great Powers: How Diffusion Shapes Economic Competition. Princeton University Press. Asia Policy 20.4 Roundtable with Daniel W. Drezner, Xinyue Wei, Etel Solingen, David C. Kang, Victor Seow, and Jeffrey Ding. October 29, 2025. https://www.nbr.org/publication/jeffrey-dings-technology-and-the-rise-of-great-powers-how-diffusion-shapes-economic-competition/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email 

uMario Gruber, An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory, Journal of Business Research, Volume 116, 2020, Pages 535-541.

                                    uQuang Bui. A Review of Innovation Diffusion Theories

and Mechanisms. Proceedings of the Twentieth DIGIT Workshop, Fort Worth, Texas, December 2015

 

Feb. 18                        Cases:

uAddisu A. Lashitew, Rob van Tulder, Yann Liasse, Mobile phones for financial inclusion: What explains the diffusion of mobile money innovations?, Research Policy, Volume 48, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 1201-1215.

                                    uJacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy policy, 28(9), 625-640.

uCasper, S. (2006). 21 Exporting the Silicon Valley to Europe: How Useful is Comparative Institutional Theory? Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change: A Research Handbook: A Research Handbook, 483.

 

PART 3                      Creating Regulatory and Technology Standards

 

What are regulatory and technology standards? How are they created, diffused globally, and what are their effects?

 

WEEK 7

Understanding and Creating Regulatory Standards

 

 

Feb. 23                        u TBD - Abbott, K. & Snidal, D. (2009). CHAPTER TWO. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State. In W. Mattli & N. Woods (Ed.), The Politics of Global Regulation (pp. 44-88). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830732.44

uMoss, D. A., & Carpenter, D. (2014). Conclusion: A focus on evidence and prevention. Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it, 451, 452.

uMajone, G (1997), ‘From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance’ Journal of Public Policy 17(2), 139-68.

 

Feb. 25                        Cases:

 

uHow the EU botched its attempt to regulate AI - Can Brussels balance its desire to set the guardrails for tech with its need to attract investment? Financial Times. November 20, 2025. https://on.ft.com/49vD8Ts

u“The digital divide over consumer data widens: Regulatory divergence in America, Europe and Asia spells trouble.” Financial Times. July 26, 2017. 

 

 

WEEK 8

Understanding and Creating Technology Standards

 

March 2                       u Paul Moritz Wiegmann, Henk J. de Vries, Knut Blind, (2017). Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda. Research Policy. Pages 1370-1386. 

Cases:

uFunk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market-and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30(4), 589-610.

uCentral bank digital currencies: foundational principles and core features. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp33.htm 

https://www.globalasia.org/v15no4/feature/digital-currency-wars-us-china-competition-and-economic-statecraft_vinod-k-aggarwaltim-marple

 

March 4                       Cases:

 

World Economic Forum (October 2020). Global Standards Mapping Initiative: An overview of blockchain technical standards. White Paper.

http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GSMI_Technical_Standards_2020.pdf 

uKim, D. H., Lee, H., & Kwak, J. (2017). Standards as a driving force that influences emerging technological trajectories in the converging world of the Internet and things: An investigation of the M2M/IoT patent network. Research Policy.

                                    

 

WEEK 9

IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT

 

March 9                       IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT - Tracing and Comparing Regulatory and Technology Diffusion, Adoption or Displacement between Countries

March 11                     IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT - Tracing and Comparing Regulatory and Technology Diffusion, Adoption or Displacement between Countries

We will be forming subgroups and each group will select a technology to trace based on the resources listed below OR a technology of your own choosing.

 

See James Fallow’s article - “The 50 Greatest Breakthroughs Since the Wheel” in The Atlantic Magazine in Canvas for a historical ranking of major technological breakthroughs.

 

More recent technological advances:

 

Artificial Intelligence/Tools/Platforms

Privacy & Security: Cyber Security technologies

Space Technology

Health: Stem cells, robotics

Finance: Blockchain, Digital Currencies

Digital Twins (in manufacturing)

Additive manufacturing

Energy & Environment: Clean technologies; alternative energy (wind, solar, wave, hydrogen capture, etc.)

Food/Food processing: Genetically modified organisms (GMOs); robots; delivery apps etc.

 

WEEK 10

IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT PRESENTATIONS

 

March 16                                 IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT + Presentations

 

March 18                                 IN-CLASS GROUP PROJECT + Presentations

 

 

WEEK 11

BREAK

 

March 23                     NO CLASS – SPRING BREAK     

March 25                     NO CLASS – SPRING BREAK      

 

PART 4                     Special Issues

 

WEEK 12

Governing The Complexities of AI

 

This section subject to changes

 

March 30                     uGijs Diercks, Henrik Larsen, Fred Steward, Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm, Research Policy, Volume 48, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 880-894.

 

April 1                          uFarrell, Henry. AI as Governance. Annual Review of Political Science, Volume 28, 2025, Pages 375-392 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040723-013245 

 

 

WEEK 13

Governing The Complexities of Climate Change

 

April 6                                   uSchreurs, M. A. (2008). From the bottom up: local and subnational climate change politics. The Journal of Environment & Development17(4), 343-355.

April 8                                   In-Class work on paper (professor will provide feedback as requested)

*RESEARCH PAPER DUE April 8*

 

WEEK 14

Governing Privacy & Security

 

This section subject to changes

 

April 13                        uKshetri, N. (2013). Privacy and security issues in cloud computing: The role of institutions and institutional evolution. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4), 372-386.

Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things–New security and privacy challenges. Computer law & security review, 26(1), 23-30.

                                    

April 15                        uMention, A. L. (2021). The age of FinTech: Implications for research, policy and practice. The Journal of FinTech, 1(01), 2050002.

 

                                    

WEEK 15

Governing Ethics in STI and Policy

 

April 20                        M. Ladikas et al. (eds.) (2015), Science and Technology Governance and Ethics: A Global Perspective from Europe, India and China: Introduction, Chapters 1 and 8.

                                    

April 22                        The Ethics of Invention Technology and the Human Future. Selin, C. Book Review. Science, 2016 Aug 19, Vol.353(6301), pp.756-756 (Sheila Jasanoff)

-- Jasanoff, S. (2016). The ethics of invention: technology and the human future. WW Norton & Company. Chapter 1. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Ethics_of_Invention_Technology_and_t/nBqZCgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=The+Ethics+of+Invention+Technology+and+the+Human+Future.+Jasanoff&printsec=frontcover

 

IN-CLASS VIDEO: The Ethics of Invention | Prof Sheila Jasanoff | Talks at Google

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT1djsHSxMY

 

WEEK 16

Final Instructional Week

 

April 27                        Final Instructional Day

                                    Course Review & Debate!

 

Grading policy:

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

Research Paper, Projects, Participation, and Grades:

40% - Research Paper. The course requires a 15-20-page, double-spaced research paper (not an essay). The study should examine a research question of your choosing related to any one of the syllabus’s four modules or their subtopics. (Portions of paper are due throughout the course).

25% - A 20-minute presentation/critical analysis of an assigned reading for that class.

35% - In-class learning activities and a major in-class group project. The major project requires students to choose a technology (sample list provided), trace and compare its evolution in two countries alongside regulatory regimes and other institutions from creation to adoption or displacement. Your group will then present your findings to the class. Groups will be formed during the class prior to the first day of the project. These elements comprise your participation grade. All views are welcome as we all learn from each other’s insights.

Extra Credit - A 5-minute report/presentation on the latest technology/regulatory news. The report should define the technology/regulation, explain why it is important, identify risks, and anticipate how it might impact society (both positively and negatively).

Special Note: The instructor reserves the right to change session topics, project due dates, and assignments throughout the semester.  However, students will be given adequate notice of changes.

Attendance policy:

Class Attendance Policy: Class attendance is mandatory. To succeed in the course, students must regularly engage with substantive, high quality contributions to discussions and in-class projects.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Generative and Editorial Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Use is only permitted in this class with proper citation. Per GaTech's Honor Code, students may not submit any work generated by an AI program as their own. If students include material generated by an AI program, it should be cited like any other reference material (with due consideration for the quality of the reference, which may be poor). When/if students use AI platforms in their assignments, they should write a note to clarify where in the process they used AI, include the prompt used to generate the material, and which platform(s) were used. See this article for how to cite AI properly: How to cite ChatGPT https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

Generative AI derives its output from other sources used to train the models without citation. This is plagiarism. Students should be aware that the material generated by these programs may be inaccurate, incomplete, biased or otherwise problematic. As most assignments in this class will require students to relay their own thoughts and analyses, if the professor suspects the heavy use of AI to complete an assignment the student may be required to demonstrate their knowledge orally in an informal one-on-one meeting with the professor to make sure the ideas are their own. Uncited, high use of AI (as identified by TurnItIn) will be reported to OSI for further adjudication. 

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

  • Identify, compare, and evaluate different sets of policies and institutions (finance, research & development, skills, other) governing different types of technologies across countries;
  • Apply theoretical frameworks towards understanding science, technology, and innovation and their impact on economic change;
  • Trace and compare a technology over time between two countries alongside regulations/institutions designed to govern it;
  • Establish good research questions;
  • Strengthen your capability to develop persuasive arguments;
  • Strengthen your critical analysis and presentation skills;
  • Research, analyze, and write a paper on any of the course module topics, thereby deepening their understanding of the phenomenon under question.
Instructor First Name:
Diane
Instructor Last Name:
Alleva
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
35074
Department (you may add up to three):

Probelm of Proliferation

Last Updated: Sun, 01/04/2026
Course prefix:
INTA
Course number:
3102
Semester:
Spring
Academic year:
2026
Course description:

This course will utilize a combination of lectures, discussion, and activities to explore the political, economic, and strategic issues, both international as well as domestic, involved in the spread of weapons of mass destruction since the end of the Second World War. The course will begin by characterizing the relationship of technology to society before focusing on weapons, with particular emphasis on nuclear weapons.

Course learning outcomes:

Learning outcomes include the following: 

  1. Analyzing the diffusion of technology in a global setting
  2. Exploring and understanding the political, economic, and strategic dimensions of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
  3. Knowledge of the history of nuclear weapons including
    1. Design
    2. Science
    3. History
  4. Ability to explain academic and strategic arguments related to the
    1. Supply side dimensions of nuclear proliferation
    2. Demand side dimensions of nuclear proliferation
  5. Ability to analyze the contours of global nuclear
    1. Coercion
    2. Compellence
    3. Deterrence
    4. Arms Control
    5. Non-proliferation 

       

Required course materials:

There no required text you need to purchase. Class readings will be available online through 1) GT Library, 2) Via online access through direct link or via Google search, 3) Posted to Canvas. Access to various readings will be demonstrated in class and you are expected to proactively verify your ability to obtain the readings prior to the class discussion date. If you have any issues finding or obtaining reading, please get in touch with me. Sometimes readings may become unavailable and I will adjust the syllabus accordingly by assigning alternatives or altering the plan. At the end of each Thursday class, I’ll help you focus on how to prioritize and approach the readings for the next week. I know, at first glance, the amount of reading materials may seem overwhelming, but I promise you can learn how to manage, prioritize, and create strategies to help you absorb the material quickly and efficiently to prepare for class discussions!

Grading policy:

You will be graded on a variety of work and your participation. The expectation is you will ask questions, participate in discussions based on lecture material and assigned readings. The rest of your grade will be assigned based on your performance across three assignments. 1) We will discuss how to review and evaluate an academic paper. You will find an academic paper relevant to the study of technology and/or WMD and write a 2 page evaluation. We will discuss what the evaluation consists of and what the specific grading criteria for the assignment will be several weeks ahead of it being due. 2) There will be a midterm that will consist of an in-class multiple choice portion tentatively set for 19 Feb and a take-home portion of four short answer and/or essay questions. The take home portion of the midterm will be distributed (via Canvas) on 23 Feb and be due via email to me before 5pm on 27 Feb. The midterm date may change based on how the class progresses. We will discuss this during the first few weeks and finalize the date well ahead. 3) Lastly, you will have a final paper and grad students will also have a presentation. The final paper is due during finals week, and grad students will also need to prepare a presentation related to their paper that will happen during the last few class periods. The topic will need to be approved by me. We will discuss the specific form and criteria for the final paper during the first few weeks of class. I will require an outline of your final paper to be submitted, likely by week 10 of class, to ensure you are on track to complete the final paper/presentation.

Assignment

Date

Weight

Participation and attendance

Ongoing

20%

Academic Article Critique

Before class 27 March

25%

Combination in-class and take home midterm 

Due Before Class 19 Feb (tentatively scheduled)

30%

Final Paper/presentation

Paper Due During Finals Week, grad presentations during the last few class periods

25%

Extra Credit Opportunities

During the semester, there may be opportunities for extra credit. For example, these opportunities could consist of attending local events or lectures pertinent to course topics and presenting your experience and what you learned to class via a short briefing. This sort of extra credit or other extra credit opportunities will be offered at my sole discretion.

Grading Scale

Your final grade will be assigned as a letter grade according to the following scale:

A

90-100%

B

80-89%

C

70-79%

D

60-69%

F

0-59%

Each class assignment will be given a grade on scale above and weighted accordingly to produce your final grade for the class. We will discuss the grading criteria associated with each assignment in the first few classes and well ahead of due dates.

Attendance policy:

Attendance is necessary but in cases where you are not able to attend class, please email tchaudhary@gatech.edu as soon as possible so we can discuss exceptional circumstances ahead of your absence. In cases where we are unable to discuss your absence beforehand, please schedule time for us to discuss the absence outside of class time as soon as possible. Reasonable accommodation can be arranged for various circumstances, however, please do not abuse my good nature and that of your fellow students.  You can miss up to two classes (but not those where you are scheduled to present) for any reason before your grade is impacted, though I reserve the right to revisit this policy depending on both individual and overall class participation and performance.

Academic honesty/integrity statement:

Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All work submitted must be original and properly cited. Plagiarism, cheating, or any form of academic dishonesty will result in immediate consequences as outlined in the university's academic integrity policy.

Core IMPACTS statement(s) (if applicable):

This is a Core IMPACTS course that is part of the Social Sciences area. 

Core IMPACTS refers to the core curriculum, which provides students with essential knowledge in foundational academic areas. This course will help master course content, and support students’ broad academic and career goals. 

This course should direct students toward a broad Orienting Question: 

  • How do I understand human experiences and connections?

Completion of this course should enable students to meet the following Learning Outcome: 

  • Students will effectively analyze the complexity of human behavior, and how historical, economic, political, social or geographic relationships develop, persist or change.

Course content, activities and exercises in this course should help students develop the following Career-Ready Competencies: 

  • Intercultural Competence
  • Perspective-Taking
  • Persuasion
Instructor First Name:
Tarun
Instructor Last Name:
Chaudhary
Section:
A
CRN (you may add up to five):
33372
33373
Department (you may add up to three):